Cases 1 - 10 of 13
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. WARDEN FCI BECKLEY, W. VA et al
as 1:2021cv03221
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI BECKLEY, W. VA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PATTERSON v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2019cv00898
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv00858
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, WARDEN and FBOP
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES et al v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2018cv00524
Petitioner:
MACEO JONES and SALLIE JONES
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, ANGELA DUNBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JARAMILLO v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2018cv00180
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS JARAMILLO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION, U.S.DIRECTOR DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WEDINGTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01014
Petitioner:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORROW v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2016cv00608
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KEITH MORROW
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BAKER v. PETERSON et al
as 1:2015cv01388
Petitioner:
CLARENCE BAKER
Respondent:
CHARLIE PETERSON and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WASHINGTON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2011cv01850
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, ISSAC JOHNSTON and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2011cv01742
Petitioner:
LARNELL WAYNE YOUNG
Respondent:
SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
