Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Didericksen v. Earnshaw et al
as 2:2024cv00225
Petitioner:
Clara Didericksen
Respondent:
Dallas Earnshaw, Utah State Hospital and Health and Human Services
Interested Party:
Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Utah State Hospital et al
as 2:2021cv00438
Petitioner:
Casey Campbell
Respondent:
Utah State Hospital
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Didericksen v. Earnshaw et al
as 2:2018cv00218
Petitioner:
Clara Didericksen
Respondent:
Dallas Earnshaw, Utah State Hospital and Bear River Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aveintinus v. Utah State Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv00048
Petitioner:
Rayln Aza Aveintinus
Respondent:
Utah State Hospital and Dallas Earnshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grant v. Utah State Hospital et al
as 2:2013cv01012
Petitioner:
Milan Grant
Respondent:
Utah State Hospital and Dallas Earnshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Monson v. Utah State Hospital et al
as 2:2013cv00932
Petitioner:
Eric Dean Monson
Respondent:
Utah State Hospital, Dallas LNU and FNU Roundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Howe v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv00894
Petitioner:
Mitchell Dean Howe
Respondent:
Michael Cox and Utah State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Comish v. Utah State Hospital
as 2:2012cv00336
Petitioner:
Holly Lynn Comish
Respondent:
Utah State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gilbert v. Herbert et al
as 2:2009cv01130
Petitioner:
Craig Ivan Gilbert
Respondent:
Gary Herbert and Utah State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Olpin v. Utah State Hospital et al
as 3:2009cv00083
Petitioner:
Ryan Lewis Olpin
Respondent:
Utah State Hospital and Rodney A. Page
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
