Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04274
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04276
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04277
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04279
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04278
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv01317
Respondent:
TDCID Parole Division
Petitioner:
Robert Wayne Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Baker
as 5:2017cv00157
Respondent:
Warden FNU Baker
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Harold Wayne Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv00730
Petitioner:
Robert Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mitchell v. Gray
as 5:2011cv00156
Petitioner:
Donnie Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
NFN Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Thaler
as 5:2011cv00132
Petitioner:
Tony Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
