General Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 411
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00660
Petitioner: LONNIE WILLIAMS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OWENS v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00104
Petitioner: WILLIAM OWENS
Respondent: PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00167
Petitioner: RENALD WILLIAMS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00022
Petitioner: SECUNDO WILLIAMS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILLIAMS v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00006
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER L. WILLIAMS
Respondent: T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
OWENS v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00403
Petitioner: WILLIAM OWENS
Respondent: D. ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CUMMINS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv01359
Petitioner: WILLIAM CUMMINS
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT III v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01075
Petitioner: WILLIAM B. CROCKETT III
Respondent: CHRISTINA REAGLE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT III v. WARDEN NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2023cv01036
Petitioner: WILLIAM BERNARD CROCKETT III
Respondent: WARDEN NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROCKETT v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00281
Petitioner: WILLIAM B CROCKETT, III
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?