Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wells-Beck v. State of Oregon Board of Parole
as 3:2024cv00220
Petitioner:
Katherine Wells-Beck
Respondent:
State of Oregon Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wells v. State of Oregon
as 3:2023cv01821
Petitioner:
Katherine Wells
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wells v. Highberger
as 6:2023cv01426
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Respondent:
J. Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Washburn
as 2:2020cv00968
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Respondent:
Sue Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wells v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2017cv01602
Respondent:
Bridgitte Amsberry, Brian Belleque, Michael F. Gower and others
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2017cv01371
Respondent:
Bridgette Amsberry, Brian Belleque, Michael Gowers and others
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Peters et al
as 2:2016cv02398
Respondent:
Collette Peters and Jeri Taylor
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Taylor
as 2:2016cv01861
Respondent:
Jeri Taylor
Unknown:
Andrew D. Hallman and Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Jesse Leon Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Nooth
as 2:2016cv01606
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv01639
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Leroy Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
