Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Brewer v. Crabtree et al
as 6:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Stephen D Brewer
Respondent:
Chadwick Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weingrad v. Keyes (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ari P. Weingrad
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sharma v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Sohrab Sharma
Defendant:
Colette Peters and W D Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pelayo v. Keyes (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bonilla Pelayo
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guevara v. Keyes (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Guevara
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Casey v. Alabama, State of et al
as 6:2023cv00950
Petitioner:
Brian D Casey, Sr
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cox v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Cox
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00386
Petitioner:
Maria D Jesus Martinez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Waltz v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2023cv00356
Petitioner:
Sharon D Waltz
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sullivan v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00277
Petitioner:
Alexis D. Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
