Cases 1 - 10 of 9,147
Abdussalaam v. The State of Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00410
Petitioner:
Munir-Ibn Sami Abdussalaam
Respondent:
The State of Virginia, Amherst County Adult Detention Center and Appomattox Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00364
Petitioner:
Michael Maurice White
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Craig W. Stallard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adames v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pope v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Jered C. Pope
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffman v. Parks
as 7:2024cv00346
Petitioner:
Julian Huffman and Jullian Huffman
Respondent:
Major Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newkirk v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00398
Petitioner:
Kenneth Newkirk
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Proffit v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Richard M. Proffit
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicklin v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00886
Petitioner:
Mondale Leon Hicklin
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Elwood Shelton
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
