Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Willie B. Smith, III v. Commissioner, AL DOC
as 17-15043
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE B. SMITH, III
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Donald Dallas v. Warden, et al
as 17-14570
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD DALLAS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Mark Jenkins v. Commissioner, AL DOC
as 17-12524
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK ALLEN JENKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Joe Nathan James v. Warden, Holman CF, et al
as 17-11855
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE NATHAN JAMES
Respondent - Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Reeves v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reeves
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Pelt v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv01849
Petitioner:
Kim Van Pelt
Respondent:
Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 1:2016cv00454
Petitioner:
Charles Gregory Clark
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
Eugene Clemons, II v. Commissioner, AL DOC, et al
as 16-13020
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE MILTON CLEMONS, II
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WARDEN
Vernon Madison v. Commissioner, AL DOC
as 16-12279
Petitioner - Appellant:
VERNON MADISON
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Christopher E. Brooks v. Warden
as 15-15732
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER EUGENE BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.