Cases 91 - 100 of 5,530
Adams v. Ross
as 2:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Maureen Nicole Adams
Defendant:
Ms. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Alcaliph Woodard
Defendant:
Domingo Gonzales, Terrance Davis, Chris Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Marcus McQueen
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Jones
as 2:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
Stefano Markell Parker
Defendant:
Linda Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Dean et al
as 1:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hal Marshall
Defendant:
Allen Dean, Matthew Wade, Bud Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv00773
Petitioner:
Carlese J. Hall
Respondent:
Charles Williams, Arcola Washington-Adduci, Patricia V Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Justice Department et al
as 5:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Justice Department, United States District Courts, Supreme Courts of United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Matthew et al
as 2:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Stanley Brent Chatman
Defendant:
T Matthew, R Brewter and R Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hambric v. Twilley et al
as 6:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Chris Hambric
Defendant:
Kolby Twilley and Nick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Randy D Pittman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
