Cases 121 - 130 of 151
White v. Berkebile
as 7:2011cv00048
Petitioner:
Karl Alan White, Jr
Respondent:
D. Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Groves v. White et al
as 3:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Artavis Groves
Defendant:
H. White, O. Tee, C. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Thompson et al
as 4:2010cv00145
Plaintiff:
Shane Duan Bright
Defendant:
LaDonna H. Thompson, Cookie Crews and Randy White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. USA et al
as 6:2010cv00168
Plaintiff:
Larry Sinclair Williams
Defendant:
USA, John Rowley, John Nassikas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Finn v. Warren County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Johney E. Finn, Johney E. Finn and Johney E. Finn
Defendant:
Warren County, Kentucky, Jackie Strode, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goddard v. Terris et al
as 5:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Goddard
Defendant:
Jason Terris, Deborah A. Hickey, Luis A. Morales, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Romero v. Lappin et al
as 6:2010cv00035
Petitioner:
James Manuel Romero
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Kim White, Eric D. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Arresting Officers et al
as 3:2009cv00975
Plaintiff:
Carlos E. Brooks
Defendant:
Arresting Officers and Robert White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Breckinridge County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2009cv00842
Plaintiff:
James White
Defendant:
Breckinridge County, Kentucky, Allen Shrewsberry, Dailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Butler et al
as 5:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
Percy D. Brown
Defendant:
Denny Butler, Kriston Downs, Mitchell Blum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
