Cases 151 - 160 of 173
Jackson v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tommy Jackson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmit Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00131
Petitioner:
Latrell Adams
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, Darlester Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Presley et al
as 4:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson
Defendant:
Dewight Presley, Lawrence Kelly and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golden v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00117
Plaintiff:
Fredrick T. Golden
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, Darlester Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00116
Plaintiff:
Billy Bailey
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly and Nathan Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Hillman et al
as 2:2007cv00145
Plaintiff:
Wendell Duncan
Defendant:
Beth Hillman, Delores Anderson, Joy Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wally et al
as 2:2007cv00146
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Jones
Defendant:
S. Wally, Ronald King, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Sims et al
as 2:2007cv00136
Plaintiff:
Cedric King
Defendant:
Brenda Sims, Lloyd Beasley, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Thomas, et al
as 07-60515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN THOMAS, LEPHER JENKINS, Warden, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner and others
Gordon v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Anthony Douglas Gordon
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Kosta Vlahos, Dolan Waller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
