Cases 171 - 180 of 1,725
Arrington v. Street et al
as 0:2022cv02362
Plaintiff:
Gideon C. Arrington, II
Defendant:
Dyanna L. Street, Anthony C. Palumbo, Wade A. Kish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Henny v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02207
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Mistell Starr, T. Vaught and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jidoefor v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2022cv02205
Plaintiff:
Okwuchukwu E. Jidoefor
Defendant:
Sherburne County, Joel Brott, Donald Starry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Sterns County
as 0:2022cv02734
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cook, Jr
Defendant:
Sterns County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Cahill et al
as 0:2022cv02327
Plaintiff:
Joel P. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Steven J. Cahill and Brian J. Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2022cv02313
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Hodson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02122
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Dr. Reyna, T. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. O'Connor et al
as 0:2022cv02121
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Patrick T. O'Connor, J. Stanek, Mistelle Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorski v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02123
Plaintiff:
Krissy Ann Gorski
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Dr. Reyna, T. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorski v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02209
Plaintiff:
Krissy Ann Gorski
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Mistell Starr, T. Vaught and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
