Cases 171 - 180 of 12,314
Abdullah v. Briggs et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Taji Abdullah
Defendant:
Gregory Briggs, Roger Lucas, Bruce Levalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valoy v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Orlando Victoria Valoy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parrish v. Attorney General of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Donte Darrell Parrish
Defendant:
Attorney General of Pennsylvania, County of York, Warden Adam Ogle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARVIN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER COURT HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. Tustin
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
SADIE L COOK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER F. TUSTIN and JOHN/JANES DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johenkins v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Robert Johenkins
Defendant:
Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON-EL v. LILLER et al
as 2:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
ALI A.I. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
JUDGE CHARISSA J. LILLER, THOMAS GANNON, BUCKS COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: BRIAN CHARLES SCHWAGER
as 2:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES SCHWAGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conklin IV v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Conklin IV
Defendant:
John Doe and Carbon County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAYBOY v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE SITARSKI et al
as 2:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE SITARSKI and CLERKS OFFICE OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
