Cases 171 - 180 of 998
Clay v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2021cv04082
Defendant:
Sgt. Nicholas Rodriguez, Officer Nicholas Anderson, Officer Brent McDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Michael Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rabenberg v. Lincoln County et al
as 4:2021cv04062
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Dave Knutson, Sheriff Steve Swenson and Lincoln County
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ronald Rabenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracy v. YCWC (Yankton Community Work Center) et al
as 4:2021cv04060
Defendant:
Cynthia Brown, Darin Fluke, Joni Stock and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Edward Tracy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harcey v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2021cv04071
Defendant:
Myron Rau, Kenneth Albers, Chuck Schroyer and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Harcey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracy v. Elshere et al
as 4:2021cv04049
Defendant:
Seth Bonnema, Dave Erickson, Dawn Elshere and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Edward Tracy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suah v. Burns et al
as 4:2021cv04065
Plaintiff:
Karoteh K. Suah
Defendant:
Chief of Police SFPD Matt Burns, Unknown SFPD Officer and Unknown SFPD Detective
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vosberg v. Lt. Kotalik et al
as 4:2021cv04094
Defendant:
Matt Trenhaile, Lt. Kotalik, Mary Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lynn Vosberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kurtenbach v. Codington County et al
as 1:2021cv01009
Defendant:
Brad Howell, Rebecca Jund, Rebecca Morlock-Reeves and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kurtenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toof v. Swanson
as 5:2021cv05018
Defendant:
Amanda Swanson and Pennington County
Plaintiff:
Darwin Nathaniel Toof
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elk Boy v. Yantis et al
as 5:2021cv05023
Plaintiff:
Travis Elk Boy
Defendant:
County of Pennington, Pennington County Jail Medical Staff and Commander Yantis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
