Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Hanks v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2018cv00686
Plaintiff:
Jason Hanks
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Miles Kranz, Janelle M. Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Lash et al
as 0:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant:
Kevin Lash, G. Balas, David Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al. v. Dayton et al.
as 0:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson, Similarly Situated Prisoner's at All Minnesota Correctional Facilities and Other similarly Situated Prisoner's At Rush City Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Tina Smith, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2017cv00437
Plaintiff:
Tony Terrell Robinson
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Minnesota Department of Corrections, Minnesota Correctional Facility: Lino Lakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2016cv02995
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stephen Williams
Defendant:
Tom Roy and Eddie Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. Johnson et al
as 0:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Charles Ricardo O'Neal
Defendant:
Brenda Johnson, Amy Johnson, Mandac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2015cv04429
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Dayton , Tina Smith , Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braziel v. Roy et al
as 0:2015cv03448
Plaintiff:
Levi Braziel, Jr
Defendant:
Tom Roy, Eddie Miles, Becky Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graphenteen v. Jesson et al
as 0:2015cv02503
Plaintiff:
John Graphenteen
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Anne Barry, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Miles et al
as 0:2013cv02737
Plaintiff:
Terrance Alfonzo Dudley
Defendant:
Eddie Miles, Tom Roy, Paige Lemay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
