Cases 11 - 20 of 96
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant:
DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITING v. SERGEANT LIBERTY et al
as 1:2021cv08282
Defendant:
OFFICER REED, OFFICER XAYAPHACHAN, OFFICER TRAN and others
Plaintiff:
ADELBERT A. WHITING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUSLIM v. STANZIONE et al
as 2:2020cv15669
Defendant:
SHANTAY BRAME ADAMS, DOREEN STANZIONE, MICHAEL HALGELO and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUS MUSLIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. SIMS et al
as 2:2020cv12803
Defendant:
SGT. A. COSTERA, SHANTAY ADAMS, DOREEN STANZIONE and others
Plaintiff:
CLINT WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PRATT et al
as 3:2020cv10269
Defendant:
SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, C. WILLAIMS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. ANGELO et al
as 2:2020cv07237
Defendant:
SGT. A. COSTERA, DOREEN STANZIONE, NURSE EVAN and others
Plaintiff:
NASHEED WILLIAMS and THADDEUS THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM et al v. ANGELO et al
as 2:2020cv06565
Defendant:
SGT. A. COSTERA, DOREEN STANZIONE, MICHAEL ANGELO and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAL BELTON and RAFIEEK GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELTON v. ANGELO et al
as 2:2020cv06566
Defendant:
SGT. A. COSTERA, NURSE EVAN, MRS. DOREEN SBAUZTONE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAL BELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DILLARD v. MAIN et al
as 2:2020cv01255
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DILLARD
Defendant:
R. GONZALES, AKLIMA BAKSH, MERRIL MAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. FOLEY et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
SC/O POWELL, SC/O MANDERA, SC/O ACEBO and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER WOODS, THADDEUS THOMAS and MATTHEW SHIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
