Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Corinthian v. Keaton et al
as 9:2017cv80952
Plaintiff:
Christopher Corinthian
Defendant:
A. Keaton, Rusty McLaughlin, Elmira Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. David, et al.
as 2:2017cv00665
Plaintiff:
David Harris
Defendant:
O. David and Jeff Ridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. David, et al.
as 1:2017cv00437
Plaintiff:
David Harris
Defendant:
O. David and Jeff Ridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Reynolds, et al
as 15-6158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKKE LEON GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN REYNOLDS, ROBERT PATTON, Director, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Christopher Alsobrook v. Alvarado, et al
as 15-13093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER URIAH ALSOBROOK
Defendant - Appellee:
ALVARADO, E MEDINA, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Florida Department of Corrections 501 S. Calhoun Street Tallahassee, FL 32399 and others
Green v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Rickke L Green
Defendant:
Dan Reynolds, Robert Patton, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassan Abpikar v. Dwayne Sanchez, et al
as 14-16735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HASSAN ABPIKAR
Defendant - Appellee:
DWAYNE SANCHEZ, DHS/ICE Special Federal Agent, ROBERT CARR, FBI Agent within the DHS of ICE and the Head of Anti-Terrorism Unit, San Jose Division, DAVID HARRIS, DHS/ICE Special Federal Agent and others
Harris v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Charles David Harris
Defendant:
Reece Lane, Steve Ambrose, Bob Ernst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abpikar v. Sanchez et al
as 5:2012cv03982
Plaintiff:
Hassan Abpikar
Defendant:
Dwayne Sanchez, Robert Carr, David Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamlett v. Mozingo et al
as 1:2011cv22496
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hamlett
Defendant:
Mozingo, Williams, Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
