Civil Rights Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Valdez v. Furhman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00542
Defendant: Deputy Phillips, Southampton County Jail, Deputy Furhman and others
Plaintiff: Paul Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Doyle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00552
Plaintiff: Thomas L. Hicks
Defendant: Mr Alvin Harris, Ms J Fortain and Ms T Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Doyle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00106
Plaintiff: Jerry Ray Hall
Defendant: C. Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Doyle et al
as 1:2019cv01069
Defendant: Joesph Migliozzi and Jon R. Doyle
Plaintiff: Demond Antione White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Dr. Farley
as 1:2018cv00454
Plaintiff: Doyle Mullins
Defendant: Dr. Farley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mace v. Doyle et al
as 1:2017cv00239
Plaintiff: Jerry Wayne Mace
Defendant: Theresa S. Doyle, Dr. E. Yancey and Deerfield Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Jackson et al
as 1:2016cv01520
Plaintiff: Kevin Tijuan Doyle
Defendant: Michele E. Jackson and Peggy Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges v. Corizon Prison Health Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00803
Plaintiff: Wayne Jeffrey Bridges
Defendant: Corizon Prison Health Management, Mohammad Siddiqui, Ann Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00571
Plaintiff: William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant: State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00500
Plaintiff: William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant: State of North Carolina, Beaverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?