Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Powell v. Starke County Jail
as 3:2014cv01906
Plaintiff: Franklin Powell
Defendant: Starke County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Himelick et al
as 1:2014cv00050
Defendant: Darrell Himelick, Kathy Lee, Captain Albertson and others
Plaintiff: Christopher M Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blessing v. Levenhagen et al
as 3:2014cv00376
Plaintiff: Alice Blessing and Brittany Bowen
Defendant: Mark Levenhagen, Michael T Scott, David E Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. SPAINHOUR
as 1:2013cv01980
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant: MARVIN SPAINHOUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crider v. Franklin et al
as 3:2013cv00617
Plaintiff: Michael Crider
Defendant: Officer Franklin, Mr Bean and Mr Wordell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Rogers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00420
Plaintiff: Erick Franklin
Defendant: Brad Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. RODDEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00094
Defendant: MAJOR SAM BEARD, CAPTAIN R. DOGGEN DORF, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2010cv00089
Defendant: MAJOR SAM BEARD, CAPTAIN R. DOGGEN DORF, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00067
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant: DANNY RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00063
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant: DANNY RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?