Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Chapman v. Freeman et al
as 3:2012cv02323
Plaintiff:
David Harold Chapman
Defendant:
Marlin Freeman, Elaine Coffman, Erika Foose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORALES v. THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OF DELAWARE CO. et al
as 2:2012cv06531
Plaintiff:
HECTOR MORALES
Defendant:
THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OF DELAWARE CO., STEVEN M. PAPER, PATRICK J. CONNORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Northumberland County et al
as 3:2010cv02502
Plaintiff:
James Freeman
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Frank Sawicki, Vinny Clausi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS
as 2:2010cv06091
Plaintiff:
BARRY FREEMAN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS
as 2:2010cv05686
Plaintiff:
BARRY FREEMAN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Miller et al
as 3:2010cv01545
Plaintiff:
James Freeman
Defendant:
J.A. Miller, Trautman, Kauffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENTLY v. FREEMAN et al
as 2:2010cv01962
Plaintiff:
JAMES RONALD BENTLY
Defendant:
MARLOW FREEMAN, GLOVE, CITY OF CHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOHOSKI v. FREEMAN et al
as 5:2009cv02105
Plaintiff:
MARTY A. MOHOSKI
Defendant:
MELISSA J. FREEMAN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF BERKS COUNTY, PA.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baines v. Powell et al
as 1:2008cv00252
Plaintiff:
Wayne Baines
Defendant:
Elizabeth Powell and Marcia Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Freeman v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv02191
Plaintiff:
James Freeman
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Joseph J. Piazza, Lt. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
