Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Jones v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01616
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones
Defendant:
C. Baldwin, Eric Aronid, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2017cv02559
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones
Defendant:
C. Baldwin, Eric Aronid, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Corizon Health Care et al
as 1:2017cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jared Richardson
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care, M. Akioyame, B. Turk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald N Horton v. Riverside County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2017cv00519
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors Marion Ashley, Board of Supervisors John Benoit, Board of Supervisors Kevin Jefferies and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald N Horton
Tony Lee Hill v. Commission on Judicial Performance, CA et al
as 2:2016cv07622
Defendant:
Judge James R Brandlin, Commission on Judicial Performance, CA, Attorney Davis G. Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Hill
David W. Svete v. Certain FCI Terminal Island Federal Prison Employees et al
as 2:2016cv01928
Defendant:
Ms. Attencio, Bart, Karen Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Svete
David W. Svete v. Certain FCI Terminal Island Federal Employees et al
as 2:2016cv00427
Defendant:
Ms. Attencio, Bart, Karen Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Svete
Sorrells v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
Shannon Sorrells
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Chorrizon Healthcare, Rounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Fresno County, et al.
as 2:2015cv02220
Plaintiff:
Percy Lee Rhodes
Defendant:
Fresno County, Fresno County Sheriff's Department, Pat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Fresno County, et al.
as 1:2015cv01714
Plaintiff:
Percy Lee Rhodes
Defendant:
Fresno County, Fresno County Sheriff's Department, Pat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
