Cases 11 - 20 of 116
Carter v. Williams et al
as 7:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Lieutenant Michael Williams, Unit Manager Larry Ross Collins, Captain Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Ratliffe-Walker et al
as 7:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jamie Wayne Dyson
Defendant:
Warden Dana Ratliffe-Walker, Keith Kelly and Mrs. S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ratliffe-Walker et al
as 7:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Meyers
Defendant:
Warden Dana Ratliffe-Walker, Keith Kelly and Mrs. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. River North Correctional Center et al
as 7:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Hardy, Jr.
Defendant:
River North Correctional Center, Stoyer, Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Collins et al
as 7:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Tarek Z. Cherry
Defendant:
Unit Manager L. Collins, Lt. D. Barton, C.O. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Hudgins, et al.
as 3:2021cv00682
Plaintiff:
Joi M. Kelly
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ryan Burroughs, Reda Burroughs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Reed et al
as 3:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Defendant:
Harold Reed, Holmes, Lt. Kevin Talley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linzie Andrew Humes v. Patricia McCoy et al
as 7:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
Linzie Andrew Humes
Defendant:
E. Kelly, Major Johnny Billiter, Rasnake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childs v. Green et al
as 3:2021cv00133
Defendant:
Jill Humphries and Kelly Green
Plaintiff:
Edward Prince Childs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelms v. Hamilton
as 7:2021cv00126
Defendant:
Kellie Hamilton
Plaintiff:
James Kirby Nelms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
