Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Morris v. Sevier
as 3:2016cv00201
Plaintiff: Vincent Morris
Defendant: Mark Sevier, James Bottorff, Lt Rippy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. SEVIER
as 1:2016cv00708
Plaintiff: VINCENT MORRIS
Defendant: MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAUST v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2015cv01271
Defendant: LISA BORGES, JANE DOE, MARIANNE FLEETWOOD and others
Plaintiff: KENNETH FAUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Logansport State Hospital et al
as 2:2015cv00257
Plaintiff: Raimal Achbay Mosley
Defendant: Logansport State Hospital, John Tomas and Douglas R Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sir Oscar Guillen Sr v. Haley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00105
Plaintiff: Oscar Guillen, Sr
Defendant: Haley , Fields , Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
WILEY v. MORRIS et al
as 3:2012cv00161
Defendant: JEFF ANDERSON, GREG BUSS, MARK EVERETT and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL P. WILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CLARK v. MORRIS et al
as 3:2012cv00140
Plaintiff: SCOTT DANIEL CLARK
Defendant: MICHAEL P. MORRIS and JOHN VENDES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWKER v. MCPERSON et al
as 2:2012cv00022
Plaintiff: ERIK S. BOWKER
Defendant: COX, MCPERSON, MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MORRIS v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2011cv00084
Defendant: ASSOCIATE WARDEN CHURCH, PSYCHOLOGIST CRANMER, ASSOCIATE WARDEN DENHAM and others
Plaintiff: KENNETH A. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sexton v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv00026
Plaintiff: Delmas Sexton, II
Defendant: Captain Taylor , Warden Widup , Sheriff David Lain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?