Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Gary v. Nichols et al
as 2:2018cv02618
Defendant:
Gail Nichols and George Smith
Plaintiff:
Quartez J. Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Franks et al
as 1:2018cv01163
Defendant:
Quality Health Care and Amy Franks
Plaintiff:
Nichole Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols et al v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2017cv01104
Plaintiff:
Terrance Nichols, Terrence Burnett, Curtis James Jackson and others
Defendant:
Core Civic, Grady Perry, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keltner v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv00180
Plaintiff:
William Keltner
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Doug Cook, Darren Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight et al v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv00109
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Valerie Nichols, Doug Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Donnie Knight, Dakota Truslow, Terance Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sword et al
as 3:2015cv00245
Plaintiff:
Marcus T Johnson
Defendant:
Steven Sword, Randy Nichols, Jeremy Maupin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Marshall County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Smith
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Office, Sabrina Patterson, Marshall County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Stanley et al
as 4:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Clayton Owen Nichols
Defendant:
Larry Bart Stanley, Brad C. Price, Richard A. Dorris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Stanley et al
as 4:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Clayton Nichols
Defendant:
Larry Bart Stanley, Brad C. Price, Richard A. Dorris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
