Cases 11 - 20 of 873
Turner v. Besler et al
as 6:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Joseph Turner
Defendant:
Nathan Besler, Rick Boone, Kelly Janica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowder v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv02267
Plaintiff:
Joe Crowder
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Lorie Davis, Warden Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv02210
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters and D. G. Peters
Defendant:
United States of America, Republican Party, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stapp v. Denney et al
as 4:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Rubbin Wayne Stapp
Defendant:
Rick Denney, Nurse Sartor, Wise County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myles v. Ricks et al
as 9:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Tony Orlando Myles
Defendant:
Jessica Risks, Unknown Pressnall, Correction Officer Unknown Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peters v. Paxton et al
as 4:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Gregg Abbott and Rick Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mentel v. Armstrong
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Vincen Mentel
Defendant:
Rick Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Williams, Sr
Defendant:
Ms. Kathy Davis, Mr. Wayne Rickman, Mr. David Bosserman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruble v. Armstrong
as 2:2021cv00260
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel Ruble
Defendant:
Rick Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Goyla et al
as 3:2021cv00345
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
J Ray Goyla, Matt Rianstro, Harvey Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
