Cases 11 - 20 of 41
LEWIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv01669
Plaintiff:
VERNON LEWIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR et al v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2016cv01277
Plaintiff:
MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR, ANTONIO LEACH and MAURICE D. TAYLOR
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, BUREAU OF PRISONS and ELEANOR HOLMES-NORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Thomas v. J. Smoot, et al
as 16-5024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raymond Thomas
Defendant - Appellee:
J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission and United States Parole Commission
BETHEA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
TERENCE K. BETHEA, TIMOTHY L. ROBINSON, DARNELL THOMAS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETHEA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01676
Plaintiff:
TERENCE K. BETHEA, TIMOTHY L. ROBINSON, DARNELL THOMAS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIRTH v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01370
Plaintiff:
JAMES BIRTH
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY, APRIL OAKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 2:2015at00592
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Chatmon v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 6:2015cv00015
Petitioner:
Carlton B. Chatmon
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THOMAS v. FULWOOD, JR. et al
as 1:2014cv01342
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND THOMAS
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAHIM v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2014cv01262
Petitioner:
JAMIL RAHIM
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
