Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Banks et al v. Hornak et al
as 1:2014cv00495
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks and Rafael Cabrera
Defendant: Mark R. Hornak, Eric Rosen, David Hicton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Director, Central Intelligence Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv03083
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Director, Central Intelligence Agency, Kelly, Director, NSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WRIGHT v. FBI/US MARSHALLS et al
as 2:2011cv05973
Plaintiff: DARRYL WRIGHT
Defendant: FBI/US MARSHALLS, FEDERAL AUTO INSURANCE CO. and NORFOLK SCHOOL BUS CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREAZEALE v. US MARSHALL et al
as 2:2011cv02454
Plaintiff: BRIAN BREAZEALE
Defendant: US MARSHALL, JIM DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boomer v. Chief Director for US Marshals Jhon Doe for the Pennsylvania Station Middle District et al
as 3:2011cv00418
Plaintiff: Rodney Boomer
Defendant: Chief Director for US Marshals Jhon Doe for the Pennsylvania Station Middle District, Craig Lowe, Romance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reynolds v. Whitehead et al
as 3:2010cv02044
Plaintiff: Michael Curtis Reynolds
Defendant: Larry Whitehead, Joseph Neone and US Marshal, unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARSH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00091
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. MARSH, JR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY LAPPIN, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. US MARSHALL SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00027
Plaintiff: BUWLUS A. MUHAMMAD
Defendant: US MARSHALL SERVICE, BILL DOE (LNU), VENCENT KANNINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?