Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Eazelle v. Poling, et al
as 2:2018cv00469
Defendant:
Correctional Health Indiana, Inc., William Forgey, M.D., Dr. William Forgey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Eazelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eazelle v. Poling et al
as 2:2018cv00471
Defendant:
James Poling, Dr. William Forgey, City of Crown Point and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Eazelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Griffin et al
as 3:2017cv00652
Defendant:
Kathy Griffin, Reggal, Sharon Hawks and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Unknown officers and nures of the Indana Department of Corrections
as 3:2017cv00271
Plaintiff:
Dakota Holland
Defendant:
Unknown officers and nures of the Indana Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Porter County Indiana et al
as 2:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
Brandi White
Defendant:
Porter County Indiana , David Reynolds , Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MANN v. US PENITENTIARY- CANAAN et al
as 2:2015cv00365
Defendant:
BURKETT, DOBUSHAK, EBERT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. US PENITENTIARY - CANAAN et al
as 2:2015cv00369
Defendant:
BURKETT, DOBUSHAK, DUNSTON and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2015cv00375
Defendant:
DANIELS, ISOM, LIEUTENANT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHAMBAULT v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS
as 2:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ARCHAMBAULT
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rodriguez v. White County et al
as 4:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
Theodore Rodriguez
Defendant:
White County , White County Sheriff's Department , Patrick E. Shafer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
