Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Jones v. Forbis, et al.
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
John Miller, Shelly Miller, Judge Todd Spaulding and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Jones, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. John Does sued as "The Unknown Members of the Utilization Review Committee"
as 6:2019cv00011
Defendant:
R. Jones, Ian Connors, Dankqua Vibete and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv00812
Plaintiff:
Jerome Thomas West and Patrick Wayne Wokulich
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Harmon et al
as 1:2018cv00083
Defendant:
Misse Causey, Stephen Harmon and Tracy Davis
Plaintiff:
Levi Louis West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thome v. Bevin et al
as 3:2017cv00269
Plaintiff:
Thomas Thome
Defendant:
Matt Bevin, Unknown Defendants 1-?, Rodney Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Caraway et al
as 6:2015cv00181
Plaintiff:
Eric Devon Mathis
Defendant:
J.F. Caraway, Matthew W. Melladay, J.C. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burke et al v. Thompson et al
as 5:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr. and Jeremy Todd West
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Randy White, Joel Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Husband v. Dixon et al
as 6:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Eunice Husband
Defendant:
M. Dixon, L.R. Etris, L. Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melton v. Monroe County et al
as 1:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Billy Keith Melton
Defendant:
Monroe County, Eddie C. Lovelace, M. Brooke Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Parker et al
as 5:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Moore
Defendant:
Philip Parker, Jay Jones, Anthony Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
