Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Robinson v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Larry Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID and Rissi Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2015cv03926
Plaintiff:
Maximo Martinez
Defendant:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID, State Judge Michelle and Defense Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz Gonzalez v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2015cv03001
Plaintiff:
Eloy Diaz Gonzalez
Defendant:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID, D Kelly, Charley Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry Anderson v. William Stephens
as 14-40805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerry J. Anderson
Defendant / Appellee:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID, Warden Lonny Johnson, John Doe Unknown, Correctional Officer and others
Jimenez v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
Salvador Jimenez
Defendant:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rumph v. Wathen et al
as 3:2015cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Rumph
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, Joseph C Boyle and William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rumph v. Wathen et al
as 7:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Rumph
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, Joseph C Boyle and William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv01709
Petitioner:
Marvin D Brown
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID and Stuart Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. TDCJ et al
as 3:2015cv01365
Plaintiff:
Christopher Glenn King
Defendant:
TDCJ, University of Texas Medical Branch, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Merril et al
as 5:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
George Winton Jackson
Defendant:
M. Merril, nfn Gonzalez, Treatment Team Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
