Cases 11 - 20 of 8,825
Williams v. Stephen et al
as 8:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Milton Williams
Defendant:
Bryson Stephen, Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC, Monise A. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Warren v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Robert William Warren, Jr
Defendant:
DPSCS, JCI Warden, JCI Ast. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Armstead et al
as 1:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Laura Armstead, John Addison Howard, Lorelei Saftler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Dunne et al
as 1:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Ray A. Blanchard
Defendant:
Steven M. Dunne, United States Probation Office, Supervisor and Melissa Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgley et al v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
John Ridgley and Brandon Sweetman
Defendant:
Warden and William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Henry et al
as 1:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Barnes, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Henry, R. Barnes, Hetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Vaughan
Defendant:
Warden Keith Arnold, Asst Warden Bethany Cornchia, Chief of Security Ronald Stotler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stitely v. Yes Care
as 1:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
David Stitely
Defendant:
Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Achimbi v. Owoeye
as 1:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Brannon Achimbi
Defendant:
Officer Owoeye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fooks, Jr v. Warden of Patuxent et al
as 1:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Anton Fooks, Jr
Defendant:
Warden of Patuxent and Corizen Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
