Cases 11 - 20 of 39,923
Jackson v. State of Texas
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jackson
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harris County Jail
as 4:2024cv02102
Plaintiff:
Amanda Smith
Defendant:
Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowell v. DOJ MRU FOIA et al
as 6:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond Dowell
Defendant:
DOJ MRU FOIA, Madill Sheriff Department and Secret Service Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newson v. Wiles
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Devoris Antoine Newson
Defendant:
Richard Wiles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fusilier v. Singletary et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Gregory Fusilier
Defendant:
James P Singletary, Roy West, Zena Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcozer v. Ortiz
as 5:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Alcozer
Defendant:
Jesse Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeter v. Waddell et al
as 7:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jackie Russell Keeter
Defendant:
Michael Waddell, Nickey Vazquez, Seth Lippert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Woodburn et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Norman Lashan Byrd
Defendant:
Douglas Woodburn, Timothy Wade Burson, Ana Esteves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Unknown makers and seller of TDCJ's Algorythym computer, Unknown implementors of the unknown algorythym computor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
