Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Shadale Williams v. N Grannis, et al
as 10-16251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHADALE LEWIS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
N GRANNIS, Chief, S. LOPEZ, Correctional Officer, C. BRUBAKER, Correctional Officer and others
Dana Haywood v. Harrington et al
as 2:2010cv03576
Defendant:
Nate Dill, G. Garcia, J. R. Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Haywood
Rademaker v. Hedgepeth et al
as 3:2010cv01659
Plaintiff:
David Rademaker
Defendant:
A. Hedgepeth, R Mack, L Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. The State of California et al
as 1:2010cv00636
Plaintiff:
Percy Stockton
Defendant:
The State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rademaker v. Hedgepeth et al
as 2:2010cv00804
Plaintiff:
David Rademaker
Defendant:
A. Hedgepeth, R Mack, L Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Machado v. Harrington et al
as 1:2010cv00570
Plaintiff:
Alex Machado
Defendant:
Kelly Harrington, D. D. Ortiz, Nate Dill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Machado v. Harrington et al
as 1:2010cv00434
Plaintiff:
Alex Machado
Defendant:
Kelly Harrington, D. D. Ortiz, Nate Dill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanksley v. Salinas Valley State Prison, et al
as 3:2009cv03243
Plaintiff:
Moody Woodrow Tanksley
Defendant:
Salinas Valley State Prison, Deniese, Tuvera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanksley v. Salinas Valley State Prison, et al
as 2:2009cv01746
Plaintiff:
Moody Woodrow Tanksley
Defendant:
Salinas Valley State Prison, Deniese, Tuvera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedgepeth v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00987
Plaintiff:
Darin L. Hedgepeth
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
