Cases 21 - 30 of 107
HARRELL ANTHONY GASTON, III v. GASTON et al
as 1:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
HARRELL ANTHONY GASTON, III
Defendant:
ARTEMEUS MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAXTON v. HAIRSTON et al
as 1:2021cv03020
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
RUSSELL HAIRSTON, KRISTIN MCGOUGH, DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIGGINS v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2020cv03565
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY W. WIGGINS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MCNAIR v. GOVERNMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2020cv02380
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEE MCNAIR
Defendant:
PENDER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, GOVERNMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2020cv01704
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, UNCLE JOE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. SHELLEY et al
as 1:2020cv01355
Defendant:
KATHLEEN WACH, UNITED STATES, ANTHONY F. SHELLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv01252
Defendant:
MILLER AND CHEVALIER CHARTERED, MARIA JONES, MARY LOU SOLLER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JEROME MILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. FOSTER GARVEY P.C.
as 1:2019cv03662
Defendant:
ASHLEY BALCERZAK, KASELEHLIE PRESS, WILLIAM JAYNES and others
Plaintiff:
CARY LEE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WHITE
as 1:2020cv00884
Defendant:
ANTHONY O. WHITE
Plaintiff:
MILTON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNAIR v. GOVERNMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2020cv00415
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEE MCNAIR
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL and GOVERNMENT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
