Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Diggs v. DeBlasio et al
as 1:2019cv03371
Plaintiff:
Andre Diggs
Defendant:
Cynthia Brann, City of New York, Correctional Officer Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFadden v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv03180
Defendant:
Steven Byrne, City of New York, Bill DeBlasio and others
Plaintiff:
Denver McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Castro et al
as 1:2019cv02104
Defendant:
C.O. Gonzalez, Davis, Cynthia Baran and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy v. Cuomo et al
as 6:2019cv06096
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Elizabeth A. Foley and Mayor Bill de Blasio
Plaintiff:
Lavar Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pacheco v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv05678
Defendant:
C.O. John/Jane Does 1-5, City of New York, Warden John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Pierre Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Castro et al
as 1:2018cv05002
Defendant:
Mr. Velez, Cynthia Baran, The City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El v. Guerrero et al
as 1:2018cv03168
Defendant:
Sanket J. Bulsara, Cynthia Brann, Joseph Fucito and others
Plaintiff:
Sage El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El v. Chun et al
as 1:2018cv02398
Defendant:
A. Borrok, D.O.C. Standard Specialist Badge #226, Andrew Cuomo and others
Plaintiff:
Sage El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cannon v. De Blasio
as 1:2018cv00989
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sherod Cannon
Defendant:
Bill De Blasio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huggins v. People of the State of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04478
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Hon. Kron Barry, William J. Bratton and others
The City:
City of New York
Plaintiff:
Ralph Huggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
