Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Webster v. Parker et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Cherry Lindamood, SCCC Pevahouse Disciplinary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Corrections Corp. America et al
as 1:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brown
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. America, Cherry Lindamood, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper et al v. Parker et al
as 1:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kevis Harper, Nico Farmer, Antonio M. Crockett and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker, CCA, Cherry Lindamood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Scott
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, (f/n/u) Staggs and (f/n/u) Trefton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Tony Parker, Eric Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Robinson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Cherry Lindamood, (f/n/u) Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2017cv01016
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Tony Parker, Eric Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett v. Stults et al
as 1:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Crockett
Defendant:
Zebulton Stults, Corey D. Cattrell, Leigh Staggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Brantley et al
as 1:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Robinson
Defendant:
Sean Brantley, Kelly Garska, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Morris Rucker
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, (f/n/u) Franks, Joe Doe Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
