Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Ellis v. Umesi et al
as 5:2014ct03064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dane Ellis
Defendant:
Dr. Umesi and Harnett Correctional Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Superintendent of Nash Correctional et al
as 5:2014ct03040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dane Ellis
Defendant:
Superintendent of Nash Correctional, C. Jenkins and Ms. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballard v. Andrews et al
as 5:2013ct03073
Plaintiff:
John Marvin Ballard
Defendant:
Justin Andrews, United States Marshals Service, Wake County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Deal v. Ivarsson et al
as 5:2011ct03161
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Carl Ivarsson, Craig B. Ellis and Jeffrey Miles Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lackey et al
as 3:2011cv00414
Petitioner:
William Arthur Brown
Respondent:
Sydney Jerome Lackey, Charlie T. Davis, Luke J. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. Charlotte Correctional Center et al
as 3:2010cv00523
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Glover
Defendant:
Charlotte Correctional Center, FNU Young and FNU Ellis
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Henderson County Sheriff Dept Unknown Officers et al
as 1:2008cv00555
Plaintiff:
Carlton Elisha Newton
Defendant:
Henderson County Sheriff Dept Unknown Officers, Corey Ellis, Athena Fox Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Harrison et al
as 5:2007ct03092
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Holmes
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, Frank Gunter, Officer Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thaggard v. Shaw et al
as 5:2007ct03072
Plaintiff:
James Thaggard
Defendant:
R. Shaw, C/O Ellis, Sergeant Duda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. Duda et al
as 5:2007ct03066
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Sergeant Duda, Officer Brodie, Guard Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
