Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Norman v. Graham
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Norman
Defendant:
Rachelle Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00409
Plaintiff:
George William Saunders
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Suffolk Sheriff Dept., Western Tidewater Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 2:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant:
F. MENSAH, D. Lawhorne, Stern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham, Jr. v. Warden Wallens Ridge State Prison
as 1:2014cv00922
Petitioner:
Tommy J. Graham, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Wallens Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roudabush v. Milano et al
as 2:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant:
F. MILANO, Richardson, STEARNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 2:2013cv00646
Plaintiff:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant:
F. MENSAH, D. Lawhorne, STEARNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hock v. Dematteo et al
as 1:2013cv01203
Plaintiff:
Charles Vern Hock
Defendant:
R. Dematteo, Western Tidewater Regional Jail and L. Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Stolle et al
as 1:2013cv00540
Plaintiff:
David Graham Goodman
Defendant:
Kenneth W. Stolle, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00338
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Pipkin
Defendant:
H. Clark, Hester, V. Kazlauskas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albritton v. Wright et al
as 2:2012cv00233
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon Albritton
Defendant:
Edward Wright, Mr. Morgan, Ms. Bacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
