Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Hardy v. Runyon et al
as 1:2010cv00372
Plaintiff:
James Hardy
Defendant:
Runyon, Tuttle, B LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FURROW v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00190
Defendant:
R. CROOKS, JOHN/JANE DOE(S), CASE MANAGER B. ENGLISH and others
Plaintiff:
BUFORD O'NEAL FURROW, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegwood-Metcalf v. Sevier et al
as 3:2009cv00453
Plaintiff:
George Hegwood-Metcalf and George Hegwood-Metcalf
Defendant:
Mark Sevier and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Fries et al
as 1:2009cv00268
Plaintiff:
Willie Henderson and Willie Henderson
Defendant:
Ken Fries and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClure v. Brooks et al
as 1:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brian M McClure and Brian M McClure
Defendant:
Jeffrey Brooks, Vance Pruden, Shawn Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PIZANO v. MELOY et al
as 1:2008cv01485
Plaintiff:
ALVINO PIZANO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER E. MELOY, YVETTE SALINAS and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Doe et al
as 3:2008cv00362
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Smith
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, Elton Amos, Julie Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boyer v. Himelick et al
as 1:2008cv00170
Plaintiff:
Aaron M Boyer and Aaron M Boyer
Defendant:
Darrell Himelick, Corporal Sugart, Officer Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pizano v. Meloy et al
as 2:2008cv00191
Plaintiff:
Alvino Pizano
Defendant:
Christopher E Meloy, Yvette Salinas and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Voss v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2007cv00449
Plaintiff:
Robert A Voss
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Correctional Medical Services Medical Staff, David Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
