Cases 21 - 30 of 33
BRUCE v. DOE et al
as 2:2018cv00526
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN DOE #1
Plaintiff:
JASON KENNETH BRUCE
Interested Party:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00985
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Department of Corrections and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Jason Kenneth Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Griffin et al
as 3:2018cv00630
Defendant:
John Perry, Brad Rogers, Kathy Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun L Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grothjan v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Jason Grothjan
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Mitchiff et al
as 3:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
David R Neal
Defendant:
Michael Mitchiff, Dr Bartles, John Doe 1 and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Berry et al
as 3:2013cv01020
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Williams, Sr
Defendant:
Sgt Berry, Lt Battles, Dilworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haury v. Lemon et al
as 3:2013cv00491
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter Haury
Defendant:
Bruce Lemon, Mark R Sevier, Daryl Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Grubbs et al
as 4:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
Javar C Murphy
Defendant:
Sergeant T Grubbs, Officer Marcus Alwright, Nurse Swan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norington v. Bagienski et al
as 3:2012cv00543
Plaintiff:
Lakesha L Norington
Defendant:
A Bagienski, Officer Nunley, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2011cv00140
Plaintiff:
Brian Woods
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
