Cases 21 - 30 of 38
ANDERSON v. LEMMON
as 1:2015cv01887
Plaintiff:
ANTAEUS ANDERSON
Defendant:
WALTER CAMBELL, M. COLSTOCK, S. CONLON and others
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starr v. Robbins et al
as 1:2014cv00392
Plaintiff:
Chanse T Starr
Defendant:
Mr Robbins, Mrs Hartzell, Mr Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2013cv00056
Defendant:
R. BROWN, DAVIS, M. GADBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL LEVON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. KING et al
as 2:2011cv00150
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT JAMES BASINGER, LIEUTENANT STEVE KING and CARL A. PENFOLD
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNARY v. HUSTON et al
as 2:2011cv00131
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER, D. BROUGH, JERRY HUSTON and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL McNARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Levanhagen et al
as 3:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Vaughn
Defendant:
Superintendent Levanhagen, K Mapps, S Hert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sexton v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Delmas Sexton, II
Defendant:
Captain Taylor , Warden Widup , Sheriff David Lain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dirig v. Fries et al
as 1:2010cv00347
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Dirig
Defendant:
Kenneth C Fries, Ronald Rayl, Jeffery Karamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STROMINGER v. BROCK et al
as 2:2010cv00158
Defendant:
J. BASSINGER, E. BROCK, D. BROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND STROMINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Heather et al
as 3:2010cv00242
Plaintiff:
Steven King
Defendant:
Deputy Heather, Warden Julie Lawson, Sheriff Canarecci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
