Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Kolesnik v. Vail et al
as 3:2012cv05278
Plaintiff:
Michael Vasiliy Kolesnik
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Patrick Murphy, Patrick Glebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Lindquist et al
as 3:2011cv06061
Plaintiff:
Tristan F Bright
Defendant:
Mark Lindquist, Heather Demaine, Kara E Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2011cv05448
Plaintiff:
Wayne A Murphy
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Pierce County Jail Medical Care Center, Carlos Ortiz-Venegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geraghty v. Rowse et al
as 2:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Troy O Geraghty
Defendant:
Diana Rowse, Mark Bogdan, Robert Rusty Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. County of Yakima et al
as 2:2011cv03055
Plaintiff:
James Gregory Castillo
Defendant:
County of Yakima, James P Hagarty, Kevin Eilmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Addleman et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2011cv00755
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr, Floyd Giles Squires, Terence Garry Field, Sr and others
Defendant:
State of Washington, Eldon Vail, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Washington State Department of Corrections
as 3:2011cv05174
Plaintiff:
Harold John Murphy, Jr
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Murphy et al
as 2:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
Steven Lorenzo Leonard
Defendant:
Micheline Murphy and Julie Kays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theriot v. Pierce County Government Officers et al
as 3:2010cv05696
Plaintiff:
Murphy A Theriot
Defendant:
Pierce County Government Officers, District Attorneys Office, Clerk of Court Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haney v. Murphy
as 3:2010cv05518
Plaintiff:
Eric Haney
Defendant:
R Patrick Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
