Cases 21 - 30 of 116
DeJesus v. Stinehart et al
as 4:2021cv01639
Plaintiff:
Alejandro DeJesus
Defendant:
John Stinehart, Courtney Rodgers, Jenna Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorokaput v. Fare
as 4:2021cv00740
Defendant:
Nick Fare
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Sorokaput
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREADWAY v. PA DOJ et al
as 2:2021cv00353
Plaintiff:
MR. PETER TREADWAY
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPROW, TOM WOLF, ALL LAWYERS OF GOVERNMENT OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PASSARELLA v. STACKOW et al
as 2:2021cv00718
Defendant:
PETER F. MARCELLINO, ANTHOY J. DEFINO, WENDY GOLDSTEIN and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. PASSARELLA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tice v. Kata et al
as 1:2020cv01568
Defendant:
Ferris Peter Webby, Sr., Bryan Kata, Donald L. Wittaker and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Charles Tice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE et al
as 3:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
WILLIS T. CLARK
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, RANDY FEATHERS and PETER J. WEEKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Urban v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00630
Defendant:
Andrew W. Smith and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Peter Paul Urban
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOWELL v. BLAIR COUNTY COURTHOUSE EMPLOYEES et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
ALTOONA POLICE DEPARTMENT, HONORABLE BENJAMIN JONES, PETER WEEKS and others
Plaintiff:
MARKALE A. SOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jackson v. Helfrich et al
as 3:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Officer Troy Cromer, York County Police Department, Alisa Litavidis and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMPKINS v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01089
Defendant:
ERNA CRAIG, THREE JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS, PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TRENT TOMPKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
