Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Cross v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv00600
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Cross
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Robert Patton, Janet Dowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womble v. Parker, et al
as 15-7066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH Z. WOMBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PARKER, Deputy Director, ROBERT PATTON and MARY FALLIN, Governor of State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
JERRY CHRISMAN, Warden, TOMMY SHARP, Deputy Warden, Mack Alford Correctional Center and DONNA VITOSKI, Food Service Manager
Galindo v. Gentry, et al
as 15-7062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL B. GALINDO
Defendant - Appellee:
GENTRY, Chief of Security, CCA, CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ROBERT PATTON, Corrections Department Director and others
Pemberton v. Patton, et al
as 15-7059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PATTON, JUSTIN JONES, DEBBIE L. MORTON and others
Puskaric v. Patton et al
as 5:2015cv00991
Plaintiff:
Joseph Puskaric
Defendant:
Robert Patton, Diana Bilbo, Scott Jay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seamster v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00979
Plaintiff:
Stacey Seamster
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Robert Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Reynolds, et al
as 15-6158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKKE LEON GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN REYNOLDS, ROBERT PATTON, Director, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Hines v. Patton et al
as 5:2015cv00901
Plaintiff:
Thurman Harvey Hines
Defendant:
Robert Patton, Tracy McCollum, Jim Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stark v. Patton et al
as 6:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Stark
Defendant:
Robert Patton, Tommy Sharp, Randy Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodknight v. McCollum et al
as 5:2015cv00797
Plaintiff:
Rusty Goodknight
Defendant:
Tracy McCollum, Robert Patton and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
