Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Todd v. Paralegal Specialist et al
as 6:2019cv03603
Defendant:
Mark Loch, Paralegal Specialist, United States Dept Torts Branch and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. United States of America et al
as 6:2019cv03181
Plaintiff:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Defendant:
W E Mackelburg and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wardell v. Ace Electronics et al
as 0:2019cv00180
Plaintiff:
Wendel R. Wardell, Jr. and W. Robert Wardell
Defendant:
Charles Hawkins, Andrew Mansukhani, Ace Electronics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Abebe v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
Unula Boo Shawn Abebe and Unula B Abebe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. United States of America
as 6:2019cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abebe v. United States of America
as 5:2018cv03454
Plaintiff:
Unula Boo Shawn Abebe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv03288
Plaintiff:
Reggie Green
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv02227
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Bonita Mosely, Unit Manager Charles Bray and others
Plaintiff:
Grady William Powers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. United States of America et al
as 6:2018cv02101
Plaintiff:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Defendant:
Hector Joyner, United States of America and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leben v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 8:2018cv01824
Defendant:
United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons, D Blakney, Warden Bonita Mosley and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S Leben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
