Cases 31 - 40 of 50
ASSELIN v. CHICK et al
as 2:2013cv00222
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ASSELIN
Defendant:
MATHEW CHICK, JOHN DOES, TRAVYS FECTEAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RACKLIFF v. US PRISONER TRANSPORT CORP et al
as 1:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RACKLIFF
Defendant:
US PRISONER TRANSPORT CORP, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIDGES v. OUELLETTE et al
as 2:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIDGES
Defendant:
MAURICE OUELLETTE, CAPTAIN KORTES, SGT DAIGNAULT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WESTERMAN et al v. COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND MAINE et al
as 2:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
JESSE WESTERMAN and BRENDAN COLLINS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND MAINE, KEVIN JOYCE, FRANCINE BRETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITHALL v. SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WITHALL
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL, COREY SWOPE, STEPHEN GIGGEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIDI v. MCNEIL et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
DAVID J WIDI, JR
Defendant:
PAUL MCNEIL, STEPHEN E HICKEY, JR, CHRISTOPHER J DURKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ERICSON v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 2:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON, JOSEPH PONTE, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLINS v. HACKET et al
as 2:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
LARRY DEAN ROLLINS
Defendant:
HACKET, LINDA WENTWORTH, BAILY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN et al v. DOE et al
as 2:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
GARRETT GRIFFIN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, KELLER and FRANCENE BRENTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANDRY v. BARNHART et al
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
GERARD LANDRY
Defendant:
PATRICIA BARNHART, JOHN DOE and JOSEPH PONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
