Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Ogo, et al v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2010cv00513
Plaintiff:
J. Ogo, R. Haenggi, R. T. Scott and others
Defendant:
Rojo, D. K. Sisto, Alvaro Traquina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geren v. Cate, et al
as 2:2010cv00206
Plaintiff:
Randy James Geren
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, J. Walker, John W. Haviland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Tilton
as 2:2009cv03599
Petitioner:
Albert Young
Respondent:
James A. Tilton
Defendant:
D Kyte, T. Moore, Cervantes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jauregui v. Weiner et al
as 2:2009cv03329
Defendant:
Jerry W. Weiner, Doctor's Hospital of Manteca, A. Traquina and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Robles Jauregui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos v. Cate et al
as 2:2009cv03276
Plaintiff:
Richard Manuel Burgos
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, Janet Mohle Boetani, Gary Swarthout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rallos et al
as 2:2009cv03234
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jackson
Defendant:
Tesie R. Rallos, Alvaro Traquina, Jason Rohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Coley v. Casin, et al
as 09-17114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW CALVIN COLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CASIN, Doctor, Lancaster State Prison and TRAQUINA, Doctor, Solano State Prison
Williams v. Haviland et al
as 2:2009cv02665
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Williams
Defendant:
J. W. Haviland, Alvaro C. Traquina, Ann Sumner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huntley v. Chen et al
as 2:2009cv02579
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Huntley
Defendant:
Yuen Chen and Alvaro C. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew v. Lahey et al
as 2:2009cv02415
Petitioner:
Joseph B. Matthew
Defendant:
Lahey, Ambrick Basi, Tan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
