Cases 31 - 40 of 284
Sykes v. Warden, USP Coleman 2
as 5:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Dorian Trevor Sykes
Defendant:
Warden, USP Coleman 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
OSCAR v. FCC COLEMAN USP 2
as 1:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
JEAN E OSCAR
Defendant:
FCC COLEMAN USP 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oscar v. FCC Coleman USP II
as 5:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Oscar
Defendant:
FCC Coleman USP 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oscar v. FCC Coleman - USP II et al
as 5:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Oscar
Defendant:
FCC Coleman - USP II, W. White, R. Stephens-Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wright v. Grim et al
as 5:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Zicron L Wright
Defendant:
FNU Grim and FCC Coleman Medium-Medical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
James v. Sperry et al
as 5:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
FNU Sperry, FNU Stevens and Coleman USP-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Oscar v. FCC Coleman II USP et al
as 5:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jean Erole Oscar and ZB
Defendant:
FCC Coleman II USP, FNU Kasmuke, United States of America and others
Respondent:
FNU Wegner and FNU Clemens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gamble v. Kirkendall et al
as 5:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Dajon S. Gamble
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Complex U.S.P. Coleman #1 Institution, D. Kirkendall, FNU Cammarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peacock v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 5:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Nicholas George Peacock
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Curry v. USP Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
USP Coleman, Medical and FNU Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
