Cases 31 - 40 of 156
Antonio Mixon v. State of Nevada, et al
as 17-17496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO LEE MIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and D. W. NEVEN, Warden
Walters v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2017cv02393
Plaintiff:
Debra L Walters
Defendant:
California Health Care Facility, A. S. Hassan , G. Puckering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brady v. State of Nevada, ex rel., et al
as 2:2017cv02534
Defendant:
Barron, Antonio Bryant, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Brady Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Field et al
as 1:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
Debbie Field, David McCluskey, Cindy Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Max-George v. Houston Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv02264
Plaintiff:
Cecil Max-George
Defendant:
Houston Police Department, Officer C.A. Myrick, Officer D. W. Duval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Barren v. D. Neven, et al
as 17-16316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD ROBIN BARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN, J. NASH, D. FIERRO and others
Guardado v. State of Nevada Ex Rel et al
as 2:2017cv01072
Defendant:
Antonio Bryant, James Dzurenda, Joseph Faliszek and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Jord Guardado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jody Carr v. Carlyn, et al
as 17-35317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JODY R.O. CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLYN, HIGGENS, Sgt., D. W. YORDY and others
Victor Tagle v. Michael Anderson, et al
as 17-15110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE, AKA Victor Manuel Tagle-Moreno
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, ARTINGER, RENEE BAKER, Warden and others
Carmichael v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00025
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, James Cox, David Kotten and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
