Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Lornes v. Arapho [sic] Police Dept., et al
as 13-1364
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM LEE LORNES THE III, AKA WIlliam Lee Lornes, AKA William
Defendant - Appellee: ARAPHO [SIC] POLICE DEPARTMENT/"CORT HOUSE" [SIC], (Jane Doe, Supervisor), DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT/"HEAD-QORTERS" [SIC] and GALARDO
Lornes the III v. Arapho Police Department, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00714
Plaintiff: William Lee Lornes the III
Defendant: Galardo, Arapho Police Department and Denver Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. City of Denver et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00043
Plaintiff: David Stewart
Defendant: City of Denver, Denver Police Department, Bruce Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Watt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02213
Plaintiff: Christopher Vaughn
Defendant: Kristin Watt, Colorado Department of Correction, Detective #99015 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. State of Colorado, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01515
Plaintiff: Donte Rogers
Defendant: State of Colorado, The and Denver Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Fuss, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1212
Plaintiff - Appellant: M. BERNIECE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: TODD K. FUSS, PAULA S. BOWERS, CAROL DIETRICT FUSS and others
Raymond Neslon v. Denver Police Dept.
as 08-15379
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOUGLAS SWEDE RAYMOND NESLON
Defendant - Appellee: DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Nelson v. Denver Police Department
as 5:2007cv05582
Plaintiff: Douglas Swede-Raymond Nelson
Defendant: Denver Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?